This is the whole product, on one page.
Everything below is read from a real StudyLedger account and scored by the same function the signed-in dashboard calls. Nothing here is written by hand, which is why the numbers are not always flattering.
What was logged.
17 correct of 17 attempted
Mole concept
Chemistry
Thermodynamics
Physics
Money & banking
Economics
Demand & supply
Economics
15 total, 7 still open, 0 in the last 7 days
The arithmetic, in full.
Four weighted pillars. No hidden adjustments, no engagement multiplier.
17 correct of 17 attempted = 100%, of 400
61 topics covered of 69 logged = 88%, of 250
0 mistake reviews in the last 30 days, against a 20 target, of 200
0-day streak against a 14-day target, of 150
Consistency is sitting at 0 because this account let a whole day pass without logging any study (last one was 06 Sept). The streak holds until the end of the day after the last log, then resets, and the score drops with it. That is the point: it measures what you did, not what you meant to do.
The number that comes out.
Developing
87 points to strong
The weakest pillar is the one to work on. Here that is mistakes at 0 of 200, so that is where the next session should go.
What it actually says to do.
Fix Next ranks logged mistakes by how often the same topic keeps coming back, so the list is ordered by evidence rather than by feeling.
Mole concept
Chemistry
Thermodynamics
Physics
Money & banking
Economics
Demand & supply
Economics
read live from a demo account · your own account shows your papers and topics
Your ledger starts empty, and that is the point.
Log one past paper and you get your first real number today.